December 3, 2012
(Lord Carey, a former Archbishop of Canterbury, is smeared for opposing gay marriage.)
Homosexuality, transgenderism and the attack on m/f are steps in a long-term satanic plan to make human reproduction a function of the State, like education. They want to breed us like cattle (i.e goyim).
"We are entering a realm of gender chaos where people can decide what gender they are independent of their genital organs. This is a not-so-subtle attack at heterosexuals, as in cases where, for example, the transgendered male demands to use female washrooms."
by GB
(henrymakow.com)
We are now familiar with pro-homosexual bias both in the western media, and in the Anglo-American political elite. In the UK, increasingly media personalities and politicians openly promote the homosexual agenda.
The stated aim is for society to accept that the homosexual lifestyle is on a par with the traditional family paradigm. Anyone daring to question this assumption is attacked and branded as being "outdated, hateful, and offensive".
The former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey is the latest victim of such homosexual swarming. Even his former college (Kings College, London) is being pressured to remove his photograph from their famous alumni display. (Sounds like Stalin's Russia doesn't it?)
Thomas Clayton, the Student Union President, said in The London Evening Standard:
"The implication that homosexual relationships are in any way inferior to heterosexual ones is one we believe to be deeply offensive, archaic and something the College should seek to distance itself from immediately."
Treating defenders of society as pariahs who have breached fundamental standard of decency is a long time tactic of Communists, Masons and Satanist (Cabalist) Jews. They resort to smears because they cannot justify their policies.
Forcing humanity to accept sodomy has little to do with homosexual rights. Rather, it is part of a wider campaign to undermine the very fabric of society itself.
Let's be clear, without the traditional family paradigm, none of us would be here, and without a family upbringing, few of us would be well adjusted, responsible, functioning members of what remains of society.
The male-female and extended family model has been the blueprint from the beginning, and both society and the newborn child rely on it to be strong, secure, and stable.
The homosexual lifestyle is portrayed as being cool, fun, and contemporary, as opposed to the traditional family paradigm which is seen as being prosaic and boring.
In particular homosexual sex (sodomy) is being portrayed as a somehow "purer", as in a more distilled, rarefied version of sex. It is only a matter of time before these ideas work their way into the mainstream.
(Lord Carey, a former Archbishop of Canterbury, is smeared for opposing gay marriage.)
Homosexuality, transgenderism and the attack on m/f are steps in a long-term satanic plan to make human reproduction a function of the State, like education. They want to breed us like cattle (i.e goyim).
"We are entering a realm of gender chaos where people can decide what gender they are independent of their genital organs. This is a not-so-subtle attack at heterosexuals, as in cases where, for example, the transgendered male demands to use female washrooms."
by GB
(henrymakow.com)
We are now familiar with pro-homosexual bias both in the western media, and in the Anglo-American political elite. In the UK, increasingly media personalities and politicians openly promote the homosexual agenda.
The stated aim is for society to accept that the homosexual lifestyle is on a par with the traditional family paradigm. Anyone daring to question this assumption is attacked and branded as being "outdated, hateful, and offensive".
The former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey is the latest victim of such homosexual swarming. Even his former college (Kings College, London) is being pressured to remove his photograph from their famous alumni display. (Sounds like Stalin's Russia doesn't it?)
Thomas Clayton, the Student Union President, said in The London Evening Standard:
"The implication that homosexual relationships are in any way inferior to heterosexual ones is one we believe to be deeply offensive, archaic and something the College should seek to distance itself from immediately."
Treating defenders of society as pariahs who have breached fundamental standard of decency is a long time tactic of Communists, Masons and Satanist (Cabalist) Jews. They resort to smears because they cannot justify their policies.
Forcing humanity to accept sodomy has little to do with homosexual rights. Rather, it is part of a wider campaign to undermine the very fabric of society itself.
Let's be clear, without the traditional family paradigm, none of us would be here, and without a family upbringing, few of us would be well adjusted, responsible, functioning members of what remains of society.
The male-female and extended family model has been the blueprint from the beginning, and both society and the newborn child rely on it to be strong, secure, and stable.
The homosexual lifestyle is portrayed as being cool, fun, and contemporary, as opposed to the traditional family paradigm which is seen as being prosaic and boring.
In particular homosexual sex (sodomy) is being portrayed as a somehow "purer", as in a more distilled, rarefied version of sex. It is only a matter of time before these ideas work their way into the mainstream.
TRANSGENDERISM
Another aspect of the homosexual agenda is the promotion of transgenderism. TV shows such as My Transsexual Summer and Transsexual Beauty Queen are aired by mainstream channels and given media fanfare. Such programs are carefully edited to portray the protagonists as courageous and deserving of our sympathy and support in their sex-change quest.
My Transsexual Summer is touted as "A series that follows seven people who are undertaking a range of gender affirmation procedures as they make the journey to realize their true identities"
The protagonists are seen as being on a kind of quest from being unhappy in one gender, to being happy in another. Also, interestingly enough, gender realignment is usually male to female.
People struggling with gender issues are deserving of our sympathy. However this is entirely different from actively promoting gender realignment as part of a wider attack on gender itself which is already wreaking havoc among western youth.
A friend recently told me about a twenty-something girl she knows who is in a relationship with a twenty-something man. The girl has decided to reclassify herself as a homosexual man while not having any gender realignment surgery. The reasons for her doing this are unclear, other than the fact that she sees being a homosexual man as being 'cooler' than a straight woman?
We are entering a realm of gender chaos where people can decide what gender they are independent of their genital organs. This is a not so subtle attack at heterosexuals, as in cases where, for example, the transgendered male demands to use female washrooms.
There is a "bathroom bill" that will allow any man who dresses like a woman to spy on them being introduced in Canada right now.
Another aspect of this heterophobic attack has been unisex bathrooms in university residences and at other public institutions.
PITFALLS OF GENDER CHANGE
The website www.sexchangeregret.com is an interesting resource . Walt Heyer changed his sex from male to female and then back to male after experiencing regret. He set out to discover if he was just an isolated case of misdiagnosis, which of course he wasn't! Far from it.
After writing two books on the subject Walt concluded that sex-change surgery "will not fix the underlying delusional psychological behaviour that caused the request for surgery."
A 2003 long term study of sex reassigned persons by the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden concluded:
"Persons with transsexualism, after sex reassignment, have considerably higher risks for mortality, suicidal behaviour, and psychiatric morbidity [diseased state] than the general population. Our findings suggest that sex reassignment, although alleviating gender dysphoria, may not suffice as treatment for transsexualism."
A 2004 article The Guardian article states: "Sex changes are not effective say researchers."
"There is no conclusive evidence that sex change operations improve the lives of transexuals, with many people remaining severley depressed and even suicidal after the operation."
We wonder if such an article would be published today.
The promotion of gender confusion should not come as any surprise. Our personal identity and purpose is bound up in our gender. The attack on gender is a big part of the Illuminati's psychological war.
The promotion of homosexuality and transgenderism was never intended to help anyone. Instead, it is designed to undermine marriage and family and to create as much chaos as possible.
-----------
From Real Women of Canada:
December is a busy time as we prepare to celebrate the Christmas season. However, it is urgent that we all take a few minutes to express our opposition to Bill C-279, the transgender bill.
A third reading of the bill and a final vote is expected any day.
Bill C-279 proposes to add gender identity and gender expression as prohibited grounds of discrimination in both the Human Rights Act and the hate crime provisions in the Criminal Code.
The bill is confusing and dangerous since it does not define the meaning of the words, "gender identity" and "gender expression." The meaning and implications of such legislation is unknown.
Often referred to as the 'bathroom bill', the passage of Bill C-279 would allow all individuals to enter washrooms, change rooms, locker rooms, etc of the opposite sex. Furthermore, the bill has far reaching ramifications for law and public policy.
NDP MP Randall Garrison, who introduced the bill, has indicated he would accept an amendment to remove "gender expression" from the bill as it is covered by the term "gender identity". This was confirmed by NDP MP Philip Toone who defined "gender expression" as how a person's gender identity is communicated to others through emphasizing, de-emphasizing or changing behaviour, dress, speech and/or mannerisms." Consequently, removing "gender expression" from the bill would not change the impact of this legislation.
The major effect of this bill is that transgendered, transsexual and sexually confused individuals will be given full protection in employment, services, housing in public institutions under federal jurisdiction. These behaviours will be "normalized", accepted and protected.
Attitude, behaviour, dress, speech or mannerisms are subjective personal characteristics unlike race and sex which are objective categories that everyone has. Bill C-279 is not necessary. All Canadians are already equal before and under the law.
Please ASAP fax, email or phone your MP, the Justice Minister and the Prime Minister to politely request they oppose Bill C-279, with or without amendments.
The Hon Prime Minister Stephen Harper: pm@pm.gc.ca Tel 613-992-4211 Fax 613-941-6900
The Hon Justice Minister Rob Nicholson: rob.nicholson@parl.gc.ca Tel 613-995-1547, Fax 613- 992-7910
Your MP: Contact information at: http://www.parl.gc.ca
December is a busy time as we prepare to celebrate the Christmas season. However, it is urgent that we all take a few minutes to express our opposition to Bill C-279, the transgender bill.
A third reading of the bill and a final vote is expected any day.
Bill C-279 proposes to add gender identity and gender expression as prohibited grounds of discrimination in both the Human Rights Act and the hate crime provisions in the Criminal Code.
The bill is confusing and dangerous since it does not define the meaning of the words, "gender identity" and "gender expression." The meaning and implications of such legislation is unknown.
Often referred to as the 'bathroom bill', the passage of Bill C-279 would allow all individuals to enter washrooms, change rooms, locker rooms, etc of the opposite sex. Furthermore, the bill has far reaching ramifications for law and public policy.
NDP MP Randall Garrison, who introduced the bill, has indicated he would accept an amendment to remove "gender expression" from the bill as it is covered by the term "gender identity". This was confirmed by NDP MP Philip Toone who defined "gender expression" as how a person's gender identity is communicated to others through emphasizing, de-emphasizing or changing behaviour, dress, speech and/or mannerisms." Consequently, removing "gender expression" from the bill would not change the impact of this legislation.
The major effect of this bill is that transgendered, transsexual and sexually confused individuals will be given full protection in employment, services, housing in public institutions under federal jurisdiction. These behaviours will be "normalized", accepted and protected.
Attitude, behaviour, dress, speech or mannerisms are subjective personal characteristics unlike race and sex which are objective categories that everyone has. Bill C-279 is not necessary. All Canadians are already equal before and under the law.
Please ASAP fax, email or phone your MP, the Justice Minister and the Prime Minister to politely request they oppose Bill C-279, with or without amendments.
The Hon Prime Minister Stephen Harper: pm@pm.gc.ca Tel 613-992-4211 Fax 613-941-6900
The Hon Justice Minister Rob Nicholson: rob.nicholson@parl.gc.ca Tel 613-995-1547, Fax 613- 992-7910
Your MP: Contact information at: http://www.parl.gc.ca
No comments:
Post a Comment