The Scientific Principles of Spiritual Enslavement

Robert Arnold, Editor

“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” Disraeli, Prime Minister of England.

People are going to wake up to the outrageous manipulation of their projected reality, achieved through education, science, the media, major publishers, the Hollywood industry, and direct government sources. If the awakening happened suddenly, which it won’t, it would create great deflation, embarrassment and a sense of being foolish and stupid amongst, in particular, the educated, the intellectual, the academic.

Many statements have been made and written about the extraordinary frame of mind or human weakness of not being able to imagine or intuitively evaluate new or unfamiliar concepts, ones which do not fit into our programmed, educated and learned reality—we shall see later the basis of this failing. We don’t even learn from past mistakes. What about the professor (and there was more than one scientist involved in this) who had proved in a published paper that man-made flight was impossible. Virtually in the same time interval the first flying machine took off successfully.

As a totally separate example the author once sent a paper to a well-known university for their scientific magazine (claimed to be open-minded). The article’s theme was that you can have acceleration without force—bypassing Newton’s laws (if scientists understood this one statement and followed through on it they could transform the world). The lack of understanding on this was so great, combined with massive egos, there was not only total failure to duplicate the material from two recipient professors but it was assumed that nothing was being stated. Anyone aware that these people are an example of who is running our intellectual world (though they are an extension of hidden influences) should be terrified. (It should be mentioned that the author eventually received an apology from a mediating professor.)

Take another look at our world today: a world of crime, greed, excessive control, terrorism, atrocities, selfishness, disease, poverty, and always the end product: pain and suffering. Shouldn’t we at least ask questioningly, Is this really the product of evolution? Is it natural and accidental, the result of unavoidable circumstances? Or are the causes the result of our being ruled by obsessive greed and ruthlessness, and manipulated by fear and brute terrorism? Closer to the truth, but this is what we are allowed to think. It is in fact orchestrated with uncanny brilliance—a cleverness necessary to continue to fool humans for so long. (See last paragraph for the real source of this intelligence.) Of course, if the humans are kept in ignorance, and set up to oppose and fight one another, in other words, are made naive enough, it is easy—most of the time the perpetrators can sit back and let the population enslave itself.

If the controlling few are cunning and intelligent enough they can program the masses to perpetuate their own problems. They can keep them distracted with no time to ponder on life’s values, positive purposes and its short-comings. The miscreants formula is to create a problem, wait for the reaction to the problem, and lastly provide solutions which will be accompanied by loss of all rights and freedom.  

CONTEXT IS THE KEY  

“. . . We are the jumping jacks and they pull the strings . . .” J. Swinton, former Chief of Staff for the New York Times.

We have clearly been programmed to believe that a chaotic world is inevitable. Every piece of news sensationalising negativity builds up a context within the public mind, creating an expectancy, a cynicism, of continuous events of a negative nature. (The science of context is so important that it is one of the most forbidden areas of knowledge—and most people don’t even know what it means.)

This belief system of a world with continuous disharmony and destruction, passes from the individual into the mass mind. An understanding of how this works is withheld from the public. All we receive is controlled knowledge designed to keep the populace in ignorance. People are brainwashed into denying the validity of their own perceptions with fear and disbelief. Any knowledge which will uplift, raise true intelligence and create greater sanity, is primarily suppressed in our civilisation. Yes, we can generalise from 'public’ to 'civilisation’. The suppression goes beyond the general public to the whole human race.

A simple question sums up the subject: How does one create naivety in a race? Obviously this has not been answered and handled and made available as general knowledge to the degree that the population perpetuates this naivety. The mechanism of mind programming is not taught to students of any discipline but continues in the most subtle forms, moulding the unaware public by procedures ranging from subliminals, to specific televison and educational programs, to every facet of learning and upbringing generally.

The key mechanism for controlling a population to follow a particular format of thinking and behaviour is the creation and manipulation of contexts. Context is the glue or framework which holds together all knowledge in proper relationship. Displacing context creates chaos (unknown to physicists this is the key behind chaos theory). In the case of mind programming, contexts are shifted, manipulated and created leaving the individual unaware. The key to mind programming is this manipulation and formation of contexts. This is a fact one will never find in any text book. The media is ideal for programming the population—endless repetition generates powerful and overwhelming contexts. Denying that one is being programmed makes not the slightest difference. One cannot know when one is programmed, otherwise it would erase.

Humans, throughout life, form massive fields of hidden contexts in their minds, which their tiny conscious mind duteously references; with the individual totally oblivious to this, naively obeying the dictates of these contexts. This is quite apart from, and much more extensive than, the reactivity from the subconscious mind from past traumatic and emotional disturbances. Let us close this section by referencing further John Swinton’s speech, presented when he had the honour of giving a toast before the New York Press Club.

“It is the business of the journalist to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of Mammon; to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it; what is this folly of toasting an independent press. We are the tools and the vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks. They pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our lives, our possibilities, are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”  

FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE  

“Oh, mortal man, is there anything you cannot be made to believe?” Dr. Adam Weishaupt, Founder of the Illuminati in 1776.

The first process which lends itself to the potential for undesirable influence—that is, influence against one’s will—is the division of energy into function and structure. Function creates structure but structure can feed back its informational patterns to function, with the possibility of doing this unknown to function, or forcing it on function against its will. For example, information patterns in the subconscious can dictate information to the conscious mind. This is undesirable even if of a positive nature, since it means the conscious mind is not in control, which is not ideal. Another example is the development of learning patterns in skills. The individual practising the skill creates the learning patterns through storage of information about movements (just making movements) and then the learning patterns act back, that is, feed back their imprint (template action) on the input (function) selecting (and amplifying) the correct energy distribution to the muscles. In other words, the learning-pattern machinery does the job for one. This is ideal for skills where we can choose to activate these learning patterns and stop them at will.

When structure feeds back its influence to function unconsciously, then function tends to identify with structure, and we have people today who believe they are only a brain and a body, that is, a structure. Let us look at the mechanism of how a mind can be mislead and taken over, in other words, made to reference an unknown (to the conscious mind) context.

Consider hypnosis. Under the conditions of a deep hypnotic trance, individuals are not aware of the waking state which was prior to the hypnosis. It doesn’t exist for them. The background context has been changed. All states of consciousness are a particular focus. As long as the sharper focuses are moving within a larger focus we won’t think of it as hypnosis but if the wider focus becomes fixated on any smaller one within it, one’s attention will remain on the smaller focus, hypnotised within that focus, now totally unaware of the wider one that was previously continually referenced for control over one’s attention.

All states or focuses of consciousness might be considered to be hypnosis. Even in high skills, a learning pattern, which is voluntary, acts to hynotise part of our attention, focussing it and formatting it (and amplifying the input energy) to distribute and direct energy to the muscles in a precise manner. The best analogy is the action of a template which focuses anything it acts on and moulds it into its own shape. This is a type of formatting and is in effect what programming achieves. If the template (mind structure) takes up all of the medium such as consciousness or the attention, the individual will manifest the condition of hypnosis. Clinical hypnosis is just a special case of this. How can the individual be made to think or believe something without conscious knowledge of this? We know that the procedure is to bypass the conscious mind, which can be achieved during subliminals, states of unconsciousness, illness, hypnosis, or electronic implants, but why isn’t the person aware that his or her mind is being moulded, formatted or programmed?

We should add that a most basic reason for all these difficulties is merely the fact that the human species has a tiny conscious—serial, linear—mind but a huge unconscious/subconscious. Thus most of the processes of the mind occur unconsciously. Our conscious state is unaware of them. (Note that much of this unconscious is highly conscious but not to the earthly conscious mind.)

Different 'tools' are being used on this planet to suppress humans. But to suppress what? Fundamentally, to not only prevent expansion of consciousness, that is, becoming more aware and knowledgeable of existence but to confine it even more by bombardment of programs; repeated patterns of fixed thinking and the formation of hidden contexts.

In our context, when we refer to science or orthodox knowledge we mean the official, controlled information for the public (and even for various authorities such as scientists, etc.). How many people, including scientists, know that the viewpoints of leading physicists, if not in alignment with the controlled information to keep the public ignorant, are ignored. We stress physicists because physics is the basic science. The public is not allowed to know about these viewpoints—no journalist’s writings, or newspaper and magazine articles will appear on this topic. If, however, leading scientist’s knowledge is in agreement with the official program we will receive popular articles and television programs available to everyone: Neo-Darwinist theories, Newtonian realities, mindless brain theories. The public is utterly duped and defrauded by these outrages (when there is no final exclusive proof of these theories). Television programs will appear 'open-mindedly'’ to examine and investigate the relationship, if any, say, between God and science, but succeeding utterly in programming the viewer with as much disparity between the two as could be imagined. (This contrived separation as we shall see later, is one of the keys to establishing ignorance and forming the basis for enslavement and the creation of naivety.)

Let us now examine the methods which are being used to control negatively man’s development.

READ MORE
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~noelh/EnslaveBook.htm