Manchurian Candidate: The Secret Government Project to Control Global Politics

Manchurian Candidate Definition

The term Manchurian Candidate derives from a 1959 novel by Richard Condon titled "The Manchurian Candidate." Condon portrays a platoon of American soldiers during the Korean War who are sent to Manchuria (Northeast China), where they captured, brainwashed, and given alter personalities programmed to assassinate key individuals and overthrow the US government. As a result, the term Manchurian Candidate now signifies a person who has had their personality split into "alters" which commit murder or other acts without conscious knowledge of what they've done.

The CIA has declassified over 18,000 pages of documents on extensive mind control programs carried out since the early 1950s. These documents prove that the government developed a Manchurian Candidate program which was quite real. Through the Freedom of Information Act, you can order these documents in the form of three CDs directly from the US government for only $30. You can also find extensive quotes on the creation of Manchurian Candidates from the most revealing of these documents with links for verification at this link.

Excerpts Proving Creation of Manchurian Candidates

Below is a sample of just two of these declassified documents and one scientific article depicting the Manchurian Candidate program. These excerpts are taken from the excellent mind control summary at this link. These documents and quotes show that the riveting book and film Manchurian Candidate are more fact than fiction. First, a declassified CIA document dated Jan. 7, 1953 describes the experimental creation of alter personalities in two 19-year-old girls:

"These subjects have clearly demonstrated that they can pass from a fully awake state to a deep hypnotic state by telephone, by receiving written matter, or by the use of code, signal, or words, and that control of those hypnotized can be passed from one individual to another without great difficulty. It has also been shown by experimentation with these girls that they can act as unwilling couriers for information purposes." (CIA Mori ID 190684)

To see an online copy of the declassified CIA document with the quote above, click here. A second document dated Feb. 10, 1954 describes an experiment on creating unsuspecting assassins:

"Miss [deleted] was instructed (having previously expressed a fear of firearms) that she would use every method at her disposal to awaken miss [deleted] (now in a deep hypnotic sleep). Failing this, she would pick up a pistol and fire it at Miss [deleted]. She was instructed that her rage would be so great that she would not hesitate to ‘kill' [deleted]. Miss [deleted] carried out these suggestions including firing the (unloaded) gun at [deleted], and then proceeded to fall into a deep sleep. After proper suggestions were made, both were awakened. Miss [deleted] expressed absolute denial that the foregoing sequence had happened." (CIA Mori ID 190691)

To see an online copy of this second declassified CIA document with the quote above, click here. In a 1971 Science Digest article, Dr. G.H. Estabrooks states:

"By the 1920's clinical hypnotists learned to split certain individuals into multiple personalities like Jeckyl-Hydes. During WWII, I worked this technique with a Marine lieutenant I'll call Jones. I split his personality into Jones A and Jones B. Jones A, once a ‘normal' working Marine, became entirely different. He talked communist doctrine and meant it. He was welcomed enthusiastically by communist cells, and was deliberately given a dishonorable discharge. Jones B was the deeper personality, knew all the thoughts of Jones A, and was ‘imprinted' to say nothing during conscious phases. All I had to do was hypnotize him, get in touch with Jones B, and I had a pipeline straight into the Communist camp." (Science Digest, April 1971, pp. 44-50)

To read the full article, click here. These are just three of the many disturbing experiments which reveal severe abuse of power on unsuspecting citizens for over 50 years now. To read excerpts from many other declassified documents proving the development of a sophisticated Manchurian Candidate program, click here.

The 18,000 pages of released documents released are only the tip of the iceberg. The CIA still refuses to release many thousands of pages. And millions of pages of secret documents on the program were destroyed by order of CIA Director Richard Helms in 1973 when he was tipped off that there was going to be a Congressional investigation into the CIA's mind control activities.

More Valuable Information on Manchurian Candidates

For more on these and other eye-opening facts, see the two-page mind control summary at this link. Or go straight to the 10-page summary filled with verifiable information at this link. Both have dozens of footnotes listing reliable sources for verification, including links to the original declassified government documents. For an excellent documentary on Manchurian Candidates, mind control, and more by the History Channel, click here.

To understand why these facts aren't getting extensive media coverage, and for ideas on what we can do about it, go to www.WantToKnow.info. If these facts were reported in headline news where they belong, caring citizens would be astounded and demand to know more. This has not happened, which is why we feel compelled to provide them here.

The entire WantToKnow.info website is designed both to provide a concise, reliable introduction to incredibly important information that is being hidden from us, and to inspire us to work together for a better world. You can help to build a brighter future by educating yourself on these vital issues, and by forwarding this message to your friends and colleagues and asking them to do the same.

As we spread this news across the land, public pressure will eventually force the media to cover these critical topics. Then we will begin to see many positive changes to prevent these kinds of abuses from ever happening again. Thank you for caring. Together we can and will build a better world for ourselves and our children.

This message is available online at http://www.WantToKnow.info/manchuriancandidate

THE BRITISH-ZIONIST SPELL

We are still living under the spell of British colonialism, the great damage inflicted by this form of colonialism has not reached its end yet, people suffer all over the world and this great instability in some areas we forgot almost what it is due to, as if it were some kind of inevitable destiny that we had to endure, look a little deeper under the skin of things and you will find Great Britain standing behind many of the actual miseries of the world, it is enough that it is behind the creation of Israel and the creation of USA and the partition of India, all these great master pieces are Great Britain‘s creations, the unsolvable problem of Palestine where daily dozens of people either are killed or arrested or abused or exiled or besieged or God knows what, humiliation, death and torture and torture and death and humiliation and incarceration, this is the Israeli symphony that is to be performed everyday by the off spring of United Kingdom.

Look at Gaza, look what they did to Gaza and what they are doing and how the population, or what was left from it after the assault, has become homeless, exposed and threatened, and what about the partition of India, of mother India? Here the devil had whispered in the ear of the English king and the English viceroy to spread the most hateful thing as the best way to cure India from its longing to independence and freedom and this thing is religious conflict between the two monotheistic religions: Hinduism and Islam, between Ishvara and Allah, between the Veda and the Koran.

Millions of victims paid their life and were exiled and displaced and killed because Great Britain did not want to grant India its independence except at the great expense of its integrity and unity, and wanted also this blood bath to continue in both countries, this conflict between the two religions nurtured and maintained by political ambitions on both sides has ended up in strong feelings of hatred that Hindus and Muslims harbor for each other, and do you know who is this person the Hindu or the Pakistani hates? This person is not some alien coming from another planet, no, this person is the neighbor and the friend and the brother and the relative and the mate, he is one’s own self.

Not only Great Britain has caused this ailment but the world order is catering to it and Israel has entered the conflict seeking the favors of India against Pakistan, this is how this unjustified hatred has been exploited unfortunately by the state of Israel where Israel (God forbids) identified itself with India having to deal with a Muslim foe that is Palestine. By their clumsy policy of associating with Pakistan, the Arabs had lost India to their enemies and have not gained Pakistan who had instead chose to be affiliated to KSA. Thus Israel exploited the situation to its advantage causing more harm to India and to the bond that always joined India to Palestine.

 

God forbids! India is the land of mercy and forgiveness, the mother of all, God forbids that it will ever cater to something as evil as the Zionist state, and how is it that Muslims are threatening Israel when Israel- backed by the wicked British crown- usurped the land of the Palestinians after slaughtering them? The place of merciful India is beside the victimized Palestinians, and all these wrong notions that Israel is spreading around by picturing the Palestinians as terrorist Muslims should be straightened out and India should recover her role of mother to all, all people and all religions are sworn enemy to all injustices. Down with partition, long live United India, long live mother earth of two hearts Palestine and India.

Source: http://danielmabsout.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/the-british-zionist-spell-2/

THE CASE OF HEADLEY

Source:

  http://aangirfan.blogspot.in/2011/01/total-dominance-case-of-headley.html

David Headley, an agent of the American government, planned the Mumbai attacks of 2008, and other such terror attacks.

 Headley seems to have worked closely with elements of both the Indian and Pakistani security services.

 Headley has been linked to the 2007 attack on the Samjhauta Express train in India.

 Mumbai area anti-terror police chief Hemant Karkare discovered that Indian spooks were also linked to this attack.

 Karakare discovered that Lt.Colonel Srikant Purohit, of Indian military intelligence, got 60 kg of RDX explosive from government supplies for use in the attack on the Samjhauta Express. (Purohit supplied RDX for Samjhauta bomb: ATS - Express India)

The American CIA seems to be playing a double game - pretending to be friends with India and Pakistan, while undermining both.

 The CIA gets away with it because it controls many people within key institutions in both Pakistan and India.

The aim of the CIA is total global dominance for the USA.

And that means keeping countries like India and Pakistan weak and divided.

 The CIA is anxious to blame the Mumbai Attacks on elements of Pakistan's spy service ISI, and a group called Lashkar, which allegedly is run by ISI.

 But, ISI and the CIA have long worked as a team.

Front row, from left: Major Gen. Hamid Gul, director general of ISI, Director of the CIA Willian Webster; Deputy Director for Operations Clair George; an ISI colonel; and senior CIA official, Milt Bearden at a mujahedeen training camp in North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan in 1987. (source RAWA)

General Mahmoud Ahmed, former boss of ISI, got Omar Sheikh to wire $100,000 to Mohammed Atta. (former UK cabinet minister Michael Meacher: 2004: The Guardian)

Neither Ahmed nor Sheikh have been charged and brought to trial on this count.

Ahmed was in Washington on 9/11, and had a series of pre-9/11 top-level meetings in the White House, the Pentagon, the national security council, and with George Tenet, then head of the CIA, and Marc Grossman, the under-secretary of state for political affairs. (Michael Meacher: The Guardian)

"It has long been established that the ISI has acted as go-between in intelligence operations on behalf of the CIA". (Michael Meacher: The Guardian)

The USA wants total dominance. Website for this image

The Washington Post and ProPublica reported at least five separate instances in which relatives or associates of David Headley warned the US authorities that David Headley was training or working with Pakistani militants.

Well before the Mumbai Attacks, one of Headley's ex-wives told U.S. officials that she thought Headley was linked to the 2007 bombing of the Samjauta express train in India that killed dozens of people and has been blamed on the Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group (which has links to the CIA). (Newly discovered warnings about American agent David Headley, the planner of the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks Case) 

But if Headley was CIA, the CIA would not want to take action against him.

Website for this image

On 29 December 2010, at ProPublica, there is an article entitled: "Mumbai Case Offers Rare Picture of Ties Between Pakistan’s Intelligence Service and Militants"

According to this article:

Officials from the USA and India think that Pakistan's spy service ISI "recruited and trained Headley in spying techniques and gave him money and instructions to scout targets in Mumbai and elsewhere".

At the same time, Pakistan's spy service ISI was working closely with the CIA and U.S. military.

Headley has admitted to working for America's Drug Enforcement Administration.

Hospital Bed, in India, by Don McCullin. The Indian government, caring little about its people, spends less than 1% of GDP on health care. Some Indian and Pakistani spooks would appear to care little about their fellow citizens.

According to Headley's account:

 A Major Iqbal became Headley's main handler in Lahore.

 Pakistani officials say they have not been able to identify Major Iqbal or confirm any involvement of military officers.

 Major Iqbal called Headley from a phone number with a 646 area code (one used in the New York area), the report says. 

Headley refers to a discussion with Major Iqbal "about the Denmark project."

 The project was a plot to attack a Danish newspaper that had published caricatures of the Prophet Mohamed.

Headley plotted in Denmark and elsewhere in Europe under the direction of al Qaeda (the CIA), according to US court documents.
~~

POLICE STORY ON MUMBAI ATTACKS STANDS SHATTERED

Mumbai Attackers were 'Hindus' and 'White Men'

Indians are in for a shock therapy at the hands of CIA

The secrets are now out. CIA (read Zionists)wants to use India to destroy Pakistan and contain China then break India as well, so much for Indian strategic alliance with US (under the wings of Israel). In a shocking revelation, an army officer, one of the 452 witnesses in the September 29 Malegaon blast case, has revealed in his statement that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had a grand design to split India into smaller independent countries by 2015...

CIA plans to split India by 2015
By: Ketan Ranga Date: 2009-01-22 Place: Mumbai

In a shocking revelation, an army officer, one of the 452 witnesses in the September 29 Malegaon blast case, has revealed in his statement that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had a grand design to split India into smaller independent countries by 2015.

According the statement, the officer had attended one of the meetings held by the Malegaon blast accused on April 12, 2008 at the Ram temple in Bhopal. The officer from the Army Education Corps said that he was shocked by the proceedings.

He added that an ex-Raw personnel, who was present in the meeting, divulged these sinister plans of splitting the nation, based on a similar operation in the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics).

The witness added that the ex-Raw official also revealed that the CIA had managed to penetrate several departments in India. The officer cautioned the witness that the meeting was being observed by the Intelligence Bureau.

Sinister plans

The officer met Lt Col Shrikant Purohit in an official dinner at the Officers' Mess of AEC training college and centre in the second week of December 2007 at Deolali. He told Purohit about a plan to take premature retirement to develop his village, and establish an old age home.

On January 26, 2008, Purohit asked him to come to Faridabad and meet a few people for his project. There he was introduced to Sameer Kulkarni and the other accused in the Malegaon blast case. Then on April 12, 2008, Purohit called him for a meeting at Ram Mandir. He met all the Malegaon accused and another 20 people, along with the ex-Raw officer and the IB source.

The former RAW officer spoke about the USSR and Purohit spoke about his plans to bring Abhinav Bharat to the fore. Purohit also spoke about Hindu fundamentals and his contacts in Israel and Thailand.

http://www.mid-day.com/news/2009/jan/220109-Malegaon-blast-case-452-witnesses-Central-Intelligence-Agency-Lt-Col-Shrikant-Purohit.htm

President Obama's Executive Order to Control The Internet

by Catherine J. Frompovich

July 12, 2013
from ActivistPost Website

Have you heard about the Presidential Executive Order (PEO) that will shut down all communications, including the Internet?

What could not be done by valid legislation passed by Congress, in effect has been done by executive privilege fiat. However, nowhere does the U.S. Constitution give one-man rule powers to any president.

But,

• What is the U.S. Constitution anymore?
• Isn’t it an old junk piece of paper that’s to be treated as if it were some ‘pie-in-the-sky’ dream from centuries back?
• Haven’t you heard talk about revamping it; bringing it up to date; or even scuttling it?
• My, what will they think of next?

Coming up to speed on the current PEO obsession, Barack Hussein Obama has issued over 150 PEOs from January 22, 2009 until June 3, 2013.

It looks like Number 44 is getting his way. We might as well do away with Congress and the Supreme Court. We could save a bundle on high priced salaries, wouldn’t you say? You can read Mr. Obama’s PEOs here.

Isn’t it interesting that the very first PEO, No. 13492, Mr. Obama executed was on the day after he was inaugurated?

That ought to make one wonder,

“What were we thinking when we elected a person who does not want any of his personal information divulged?”

So much for the transparency plank of his presidential candidacy platform; it was nothing more than wet sawdust!

We have to question if his very first PEO precludes Mr. Obama’s phones, computers, and other personal information from the same surveillance every U.S. citizen is subjected to? Good question?

Something most citizens probably do not know is that PEOs become hard fast law once published in the Federal Register. Here’s an example of a published PEO.

No one - not the electorate, i.e., voters, Congress, or even the U.S. Supreme Court - can challenge, ignore, or negate them.

So theoretically, can any president declare him- or herself a little tin hat dictator, if he or she wants to? You betcha! That fact alone should be the most sobering factor to consider whenever pushing a voting machine lever. But, then civics lessons no longer are taught in grade school or even at high school level; what a shame!

Can that omission be considered a dumbing down technique, similar to fluoride in our drinking water?

So why did Mr. Obama issue that PEO? His reasoning may have been that the government may need access to all our telephones, computers, cable communications, etc. in the name of national security. W-h-a-t? That sounds like verifiable police state activity, wouldn’t you say?

What that PEO really does is to empower the Department of Homeland Security to have,

"the authority to seize private facilities when necessary, effectively shutting down or limiting civilian communications." ^[1]

Officially, that PEO is labeled "Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions" executed Friday, July 6, 2012 - a day we all may live to regret in addition to Election Day 2008.

Personally, this writer has another take on that PEO and it goes something like this: In effect, it’s a perfect way to close down the alternate press that has become a thorn in the side of oppressive governments everywhere, just not in the USA.

Once they can disable communications exposing their nasty little lies, secrets, and other crap that is carried on in the name of their idea of ‘democracy’, then they have total control. 

Total control: that’s what,

• Hitler (Germany)
• Stalin (Russia)
• Pol Pot (Cambodia)
• Mao Zedong (China)
• Castro (Cuba),

...and those of that ilk also seized.

If you don’t know about those power grabbers, maybe you should check out some history books.

• How can that same police state activity be happening here in the United States of America?
• Was what happened during the Boston Marathon a preview?
• When do totalitarian hardships and genocide kick in, is the next question we ought to be pondering?

RT news website blares, "Obama gives himself control of all communication systems in America."

All the above said, this writer has to wonder who really is pulling the strings on the puppets and marionettes who are regarded as world leaders.

According to Winston Lord, a former Council on Foreign Relations president,

“The Trilateral Commission doesn’t run the world, the Council on Foreign Relations does that!”

So what do some of the CFR members have to say about us, the two-legged creatures of the world?

None other than Henry Kissinger, says this:

• Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy. 
• The elderly are useless eaters. 

But the one quote that really gets this writer’s attention is what Zbigniew Brzezinski said:

These new and old major powers face still yet another novel reality - in some respects, unprecedented.

And it is that while the lethality, the lethality, of their power is greater than ever, their capacity to impose control over the politically awakened masses of the world is at a historic low.

To put it rather bluntly, and I was flattered that the British foreign secretary repeated this, as follows: namely, in earlier times, it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control a million people.

When will the masses finally wake up? 

Notes

[1] Obama gives himself control of all communication systems in America

Reference

• Millions Spent to Confuse Public About Geoengineering

War not human nature

Jul 21, 2013

Steve Connor

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/War-not-human-nature/articleshow/21206010.cms

New study of tribal societies finds warfare not innate concept but a recent phenomenon invented by 'civilised' societies.

Is it natural for humans to make war? Is organised violence between rival political groups an inevitable outcome of the human condition ? Some scholars believe the answer is yes, but new research suggests not.

A study of tribal societies that live by hunting and foraging has found that war is an alien concept and not, as some academics have suggested, an innate feature of socalled "primitive people".

The findings have re-opened a bitter academic dispute over whether war is a relatively recent phenomenon invented by "civilised" societies over the past few thousand years, or a much older part of human nature. In other words, is war an ancient and chronic condition that helped to shape humanity over many hundreds of thousands of years?

The idea is that war is the result of an evolutionary ancient predisposition that humans may have inherited in their genetic makeup as long ago as about 7 million years, when we last shared a common ancestor with chimpanzees - who also wage a kind of war between themselves.

However, two anthropologists believe this is a myth and have now produced evidence to show it. Douglas Fry and Patrik Soderberg of Abo Akademi University in Vasa, Finland, studied 148 violently lethal incidents documented by anthropologists working among 21 mobile bands of huntergatherer societies, which some scholars have suggested as a template for studying how humans lived for more than 99.9 per cent of human history, before the invention of agriculture about 10,000 years ago.

They found that only a tiny minority of violent deaths come close to being defined as acts of war. Most of the violence was perpetrated by one individual against another and usually involved personal grudges involving women or stealing. About 85 per cent of the deaths involved killers and victims who belonged to the same social group, and about two thirds of all the violent deaths could be attributed to family feuds, disputes over wives, accidents or "legal" executions, the researchers found.

"When we looked at all the violent events about 55 per cent of them involved one person killing another. That's not war. When we looked at group conflicts, the typical pattern was feuds between families and revenge killings, which is not war either," said Dr Fry. "It has been tempting to use these mobile foraging societies as rough analogies of the past and to ask how old warfare is and whether it is part of human nature. Our study shows that war is obviously not very common," he said.

Only a tiny minority of cases involved more organised killing between rival bands of people, which could fall into the definition of war-like behaviour. Most of these involved only one of the 21 groups included in the study - the Tiwi people of Australia who seemed to be particularly prone to violent incidents, Dr Fry said.

Rather than finding war ubiquitous , the two researchers found little evidence that hunter-gatherer societies were in a constant state of violent conflict with rival groups. In short they found that some of the most "primitive" peoples on Earth were actually quite peaceful compared to modern, developed nations.

"These findings imply that warfare was probably not very common before the advent of agriculture , when most if not all humans lived as nomadic foragers," Kirk Endicott, an anthropologist at Dartmouth College told the journal Science, where the study is published.

The findings also question the conclusions of well-respected academics such as Harvard's Stephen Pinker and University of California's Jared Diamond, both of whom have recently published best-selling books on the subject of war-like aggression and tribal societies.

THE INDEPENDENT

Political management of the ET presence

Political management of the ET presence has evolved greatly since the Second World War era.

Starting initially as a process firmly controlled by Presidential administrations that exercised executive oversight, thereby making it part of the democratic process despite its secrecy and lack of congressional participation, political management evolved to the point where Presidential administrations were not fully informed of and had no executive control over many aspects of the ET presence.

This meant that the political management process had dubious constitutional validity and was controlled by a few actors who could be tied to the Rockefeller-Kissinger axis, and their respective ties to US corporations and elite foreign policy bodies such as the Council on Foreign Relations.

The US-British-Australian intervention in Iraq suggests that political management of the ET process has evolved to yet another level. Now the US and its allies are prepared to militarily intervene in others in order to gain strategic goals vis-à-vis the ET presence.

The most important of which are,
 
---to maintain official secrecy of the ET presence,
 
---withhold from the general public the true nature of the historic role played by ETs 
in ancient civilizations,

---and to gain whatever military advantage possible from the reverse engineering of ET technology found in countries that, like Iraq, have been prominent sites hosting an ET presence.

According to whistleblowers sources, there are numerous ancient ET bases that are being increasingly discovered around the planet.

Consequently, it is likely that the intervention in Iraq will set a precedent for similar interventions elsewhere across the planet for reasons that increasingly have to do with the political management of the ET presence.

The strategic thinking of organizations such as MJ-12/PI-40 is based on the perception that the best analytical minds and strategic thinkers are employed in managing the ET process, and that while this may not be acceptable from a democratic standpoint which emphases executive or congressional oversight of all government activities, it is acceptable from a national security perspective.

What can be concluded here is that the view that indeed the ‘best minds’ are in charge of the political management of the ET presence is misplaced. Information of the ET presence has been increasingly controlled and spun in a way that suggests that real decision making power has been inexorably restricted to fewer and fewer individuals who reflect conservative political philosophies typically associated with the Republican party.

While it is impossible to say exactly how many individuals exercise real influence in politically managing the ET presence, the history of the Rockefeller-Kissinger involvement and the prominent roles played by Corporate America and the Council on Foreign Relations, suggests that this influence is restricted to very few.

 Eisenhower’s warning about the ‘best minds’ not being in control suggests that the elite club of ‘experts’ that dictate how the political management of the ET presence is to be conducted, are overly influenced by Corporate and elite interests sympathetic to world views associated with the military-intelligence communities.

Introducing greater transparency into all aspects of managing the ET presence will make it possible to expand the restricted circle of power and influence that controls information concerning the ET presence in a way that does indeed make it possible for the best minds to be formally in charge of politically managing the ET presence.

 The erosion of executive control over the political management of the ET presence has reduced Presidents to at best, rubber stamps of MJ-12/PI-40 policies (this appeared to be the case in the Nixon, Ford, Reagan and both Bush administrations), or, at worst, to political impotence as appears to have occurred in the cases of the Carter and Clinton administrations. The policies of the present Bush administration indicate that the US presidency is reduced to little more than a vehicle for the realization of questionable policies concerning how to manage the ET presence.

When combined with the blanket of secrecy that has prevented the US Congress and the American public playing a meaningful role in the political management of the ET presence, the current situation is a profound problem for those truly committed to principles of democratic governance and liberty in the US and elsewhere on the planet.

President Eisenhower demonstrated he became all too aware of the true problem confronting the US as a nation in dealing with the ET presence – a de facto political coup by interests closely allied with Corporate America and the military-intelligence communities.

It is time that the American public understood the true nature of his warning and begin comprehensive political reforms to address the threat to liberty Eisenhower was alluding to.

  Political Management of the Extraterrestrial Presence
by Michael E. Salla, PhD.
from Exopolitics Website

Contents

- Abstract

- About the Author

- Introduction

- Phase One - Crisis Management of the Extraterrestrial Presence

- Phase Two - The Truman Administration and the Decision to Maintain Secrecy

- Phase Three - The Erosion of Executive Oversight of Clandestine Organizations

- Phase Four - The Era of Autonomy and Impunity for Clandestine Organizations

- The Prominence of Henry Kissinger as PI-40’s Master Strategist

- Political Impotence of the Carter and Clinton Administrations - The Threat posed by Reagan

- Phase Five - The Political Management of Iraq and its Ancient ET Technology

- Conclusions

- Endnotes

Government behind Parliament attack and 26/11

Govt behind Parliament attack, 26/11: Ishrat probe officer
 

NEW DELHI: In what is certain to escalate the already vicious fight between the CBI and the IB over the IshratJahan "fake encounter case", a former home ministry officer has alleged that a member of the CBI-SIT team had accused incumbent governments of "orchestrating" the terror attack on Parliament and the 26/11 carnage in Mumbai. 

R V S Mani, who as home ministry under-secretary signed the affidavits submitted in court in the alleged encounter case, has said that Satish Verma, until recently a part of the CBI-SIT probe team, told him that both the terror attacks were set up "with the objective of strengthening the counter-terror legislation (sic)". 

Mani has said that Verma "...narrated that the 13.12. 2001(attack on Parliament) was followed by Pota (Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act) and 26/11 2008 (terrorists' siege of Mumbai) was followed by amendment to the UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act)." 

The official has alleged Verma levelled the damaging charge while debunking IB's inputs labelling the three killed with Ishrat in the June 2004 encounter as Lashkar terrorists. 

Contacted by TOI, Verma refused to comment. "I don't know what the complaint is, made when and to whom. Nor am I interested in knowing. I cannot speak to the media on such matters. Ask the CBI," said the Gujarat cadre IPS officer who after being relieved from the SIT is working as principal of the Junagadh Police Training College. 

Mani, currently posted as deputy land and development officer in the urban development ministry, has written to his seniors that he retorted to Verma's comments telling the IPS officer that he was articulating the views of Pakistani intelligence agency ISI. 

According to him, the charge was levelled by Verma in Gandhinagar on June 22 while questioning Mani about the two home ministry affidavits in the alleged encounter case. 

In his letter to the joint secretary in the urban development ministry, Mani has accused Verma of "coercing" him into signing a statement that is at odds with facts as he knew them. He said Verma wanted him to sign a statement saying that the home ministry's first affidavit in the Ishrat case was drafted by two IB officers.

"Knowing fully well that this would tantamount to falsely indicting of (sic) my seniors at the extant time, I declined to sign any statement." 

Giving the context in which Verma allegedly levelled the serious charge against the government, Mani said the IPS officer, while questioning him, had raised doubts about the genuineness of IB's counter-terror intelligence. He disputed the veracity of the input on the antecedents of the three killed in June 2004 on the outskirts of Ahmedabad with Ishrat in the alleged encounter which has since become a polarizing issue while fuelling Congress's fight with Gujarat CM Narendra Modi. 

Gujarat Police has justified the encounter citing the IB report that Pakistani nationals Zeeshan Zohar, Amzad Ali Rana and Javed Sheikh were part of a Lashkar module which had reached Gujarat to target Modi and carry out terrorist attacks. 

In its first affidavit, filed in August 2009, the home ministry had cited IB inputs that those killed with Ishrat in the alleged encounter were part of a Lashkar sleeper cell, and had objected to a CBI probe into the "encounter". 

In its second affidavit, filed in September 2009, the home ministry, irked by the Gujarat government treating the first affidavit as justification of the encounter, said the IB input did not constitute conclusive proof of the terrorist antecedents of those killed. It supported the demand for a CBI probe. 

Mani said Verma doubted the input saying MHA's first affidavit was actually drafted by IB officer Rajinder Kumar, who looked after IB's operations in Gujarat at the time of Ishrat "encounter" and now runs the serious risk of being chargesheeted by the CBI for hatching the conspiracy behind the alleged extra-judicial killings. 

Mani said Verma stuck to his guns even after being told that the home ministry did not need outside help. The former home ministry official said Verma insisted that the "input" was prepared after the encounter. 

(Govt behind Parliament attack, 26/11: Ishrat probe officer - The Times of India)

HAARP facility shuts down and will be dismantled

July 16, 2013 - The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) — a subject of fascination for many hams and the target of conspiracy theorists and anti-government activists — has closed down. HAARP’s program manager, Dr James Keeney at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico, told ARRL that the sprawling 35-acre ionospheric research facility in remote Gakona, Alaska, has been shuttered since early May.

“Currently the site is abandoned,” he said. “It comes down to money. We don’t have any.” Keeney said no one is on site, access roads are blocked, buildings are chained and the power turned off. HAARP’s website through the University of Alaska no longer is available; Keeney said the program can’t afford to pay for the service. “Everything is in secure mode,” he said, adding that it will stay that way at least for another 4 to 6 weeks. In the meantime a new prime contractor will be coming on board to run the government owned-contractor operated (GOCO) facility.

HAARP put the world on notice two years ago that it would be shutting down and did not submit a budget request for FY 15, Keeney said, “but no one paid any attention.” Now, he says, they’re complaining. “People came unglued,” Keeney said, noting that he’s already had inquiries from Congress. Universities that depended upon HAARP research grants also are upset, he said.

The only bright spot on HAARP’s horizon right now is that the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is expected on site as a client to finish up some research this fall and winter. DARPA has nearly $8.8 million in its FY 14 budget plan to research “physical aspects of natural phenomena such as magnetospheric sub-storms, fire, lightning and geo-physical phenomena.”

The proximate cause of HAARP’s early May shutdown was less fiscal than environmental, Keeney said. As he explained it, the diesel generators on site no longer pass Clean Air Act muster. Repairing them to meet EPA standards will run $800,000. Beyond that, he said, it costs $300,000 a month just to keep the facility open and $500,000 to run it at full capacity for 10 days.

Jointly funded by the US Air Force Research Laboratory and the US Naval Research Laboratory, HAARP is an ionospheric research facility. Its best-known apparatus is its 3.6 MW HF (approximately 3 to 10 MHz) ionospheric research instrument (IRI), feeding an extensive system of 180 gain antennas and used to “excite” sections of the ionosphere. Other onsite equipment is used to evaluate the effects.

Larry Ledlow, N1TX, of Fairbanks, Alaska, said HAARP ionosonde and riometer data have been “invaluable, especially being more or less local, to understand current conditions in the high latitudes.” He said data from other sites “simply do not accurately reflect the unique propagation we endure here.”

To fill the gap, Ledlow said, several members of the Arctic Amateur Radio Club — including Eric Nichols, KL7AJ, author of Radio Science for the Radio Amateur and articles in QST — have discussed building their own instruments. “It’s all very preliminary,” he said, “but we really feel the pinch losing HAARP.” Nichols, of North Pole, Alaska, has conducted experiments at HAARP. He called the shutdown “a great loss to interior Alaska hams and many others.”

The ultra-high power facility long has intrigued hams, even outside of Alaska. In 1997, HAARP transmitted test signals on HF (3.4 MHz and 6.99 MHz) and solicited reports from hams and short-wave listeners in the “Lower 48” to determine how well the HAARP transmissions could be heard to the south. In 2007 HAARP succeeded in bouncing a 40 meter signal off the moon. Earlier this year, HAARP scientists successfully produced a sustained high-density plasma cloud in Earth’s upper atmosphere.

As things stand, the Air Force has possession for now, but if no other agency steps forward to take over HAARP, the unique facility will be dismantled, Keeney said. He pointed out that it would cost less to bulldoze the antenna field than it would to replace the 180 antennas.

Splashy web postings abound, blaming HAARP for controlling the weather — most recently in the case of Hurricane Sandy and the spate of tornados — and for causing other natural disasters. Quipped Keeney, “If I actually could affect the weather, I’d keep it open.”

Sources and more information:

• HAARP Facility Shuts Down
The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) - a subject of fascination for many hams and the target of conspiracy theorists and anti-government activists - has closed down. HAARP's program manager, Dr James Keeney at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico, told ARRL that the sprawling 35-acre ionospheric research facility in...

• B/S ALERT HAARP Shuts Down WOW REALLY !
Home HAARP POWER B S ALERT HAARP Shuts Down WOW REALLY ! B S ALERT HAARP Shuts Down WOW REALLY ! DARPA allocates funds for the use of HAARP vol3ch15 Executive Summary In 2025, US aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications.

• HAARP facility shuts down

• Navy Admits Making Ionospheric Plasma Clouds Using HAARP