American Law of the Land

A Law By and For the People

Why a new law form? First, because English Common Law (Anlgo-American Common Law) functions in violation of natural law, which is observed and oral, not written. Second, because English Common Law is developed by paid judges rather than the people. Third, because English Common Law is based on precedent (prior court decisions) rather than on the current cultural context of the case. And we could go on, but you get the idea. Probably the most important reasons, though, are that 1.) the precedent set in Britain (and thus, America) adheres to International Uniform Commercial Code (reorganized as the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods or CISG Vienna Convention) derived from Vatican Law, and 2.) law in America has been based on a misrepresented 1789 United States Constitution which operates under Commercial Law (Vatican Law), not Common Law. Seem convoluted and confusing? Yes, we think so too.

Law has always derived its legitimacy from the consent of the people. Over the past two decades, Americans have united en masse to declare themselves living inhabitants of the Continental United States, in full understanding that the land we love fraudulently operates as a British subcorporation under Commercial Law, also known as Maritime Law or the Law of the Sea (Holy See). This happened when the 1783 Treaty of Paris was signed, establishing King George III trustee over American interests on the "High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways" and thus controlling American International commerce.

America's many faces

Our founders knew what they were up against when they created America's first Constitution, the 1781 Articles of Confederation, which limited Congress and left full sovereignty with the individual states. But their ability to protect our liberties was severely challenged through the Revolutionary War, which most Americans, until recently, believed was won by the Confederation. Instead, we were set up for a knockout punch by the 1783 Treaties of Paris and Versailles.

Certain Congressional delegates interested in national banking and maintaining commercial relations with Britain raised objections to the Articles of Confederation on the grounds they 1.) did not allow Congress to collect taxes to raise money, 2.) left Congress powerless to regulate interstate commerce, 3.) did not allow Congress to raise an army, and 4.) provided no national court system to interpret laws. They launched a campaign challenging the Articles, but the case for big government was a difficult sell. In what the federalists hoped would be viewed as a compromise, they, through the pen of James Madison, drafted the Bill of Rights and offered them as the heart of a federal constitution. It was accepted and the new United States Constitution was ratified in 1789. So now America had two Constitutions, one for the land of the United States of America, as stated in the opening, "The stile of this confederacy shall be 'The UNITED STATES of AMERICA' ," and one operating under International, Maritime-Admiralty Law for commerce styled "UNITED STATES". See Cornell Law Dictionary, section 15: "UNITED STATES" means (A) a Federal corporation (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States." (link, scroll to bottom of page). We have been subject to the law of the sea, unbeknownst to us, as 'citizens' of the UNITED STATES. Now that we know, it's time to live the law we inherited: the People's law, the Law of the Land.